
Sebastian Scheiner/AP
A few days ago, a picture appeared on the Internet showing some Israeli girls drawing/writing on artillery shells that were to be fired into Lebanon. It received immediate condemnation from all quarters - an example of how Israel is teaching their children to hate. (It was seeded here).
The problem is that the full story behind the pictures was not released. All people saw were images, and many people jumped to conclusions about what these images meant.
Now check out this post by Lisa Goldman, a journalist in Israel who did some investigative reporting into the circumstances behind this picture, what was motivating the children, what they were writing and towards whom was their animosity directed (and towards whom was it not). Please read the whole thing to get a better understanding of the circumstances.
I would like to quote the end of Lisa's words:
I've been thinking for the last two days about this photo and the storm of reaction it set off. I worry about the climate of hate that would lead people to look at it and automatically assume the absolute worst - and then use the photo to dehumanize and victimize. I wonder why so many people seem to take satisfaction in believing that little Israeli girls with felt markers in their hands - not weapons, but felt markers - are evil, or spawned by an evil society. I wonder how those people would feel if Israelis were to look at a photo of a Palestinian child wearing a mock suicide belt in a Hamas demonstration and conclude that all Palestinians - nay, all Arabs - are evil.
And I wonder why it is so difficult to think a little, to get it into our heads that television news and photojournalism manipulate our thoughts and emotions.
Links to anti-Israel websites with that photo placed prominently next to the image of a dead Lebanese child have been sent to me several times. Someone has been rushing around the Israeli blogosphere, leaving the link to one particularly abhorrent site in the comments boxes. And it makes me really sad that the emotional climate has deteriorated to this point.
The moderates of the Middle East are locked in a battle with the extremists. And look what they did to the moderates. Without blinking, without thinking, we fell victim to the classic "divide and conquer" technique. We work hard for months and years to build connections, develop our societies, educate ourselves, promote democracy and free speech... And they destroy it all, in less than a week. And we let them.
Aside from my disgust and wonderment regarding how this picture led so many people to assume such bad things about Jews and Israelis so quickly, the issue as a whole brings up some broader topics relating to how we digest the media that is put in front of us.
From all of the conflicts going on throughout the world (Israel, Iraq and beyond), we are fed a steady diet of news. On-the-scene reporting, editorials, and pictures. We all know that for the most part, most (if not all) of these items are formed with an agenda in mind - usually political, financial or both. (Even a newspaper claims not to be biased still publishes items that will sell more copies of their paper, in order not to go out of business - a financial agenda). We know this, yet still let ourselves become manipulated by the stories and images (especially the images) that we see.
Why is this? Is it that for every issue, we are either well-enough informed already to have pre-existing biases (to which we seek to conform all news items and pictures thrown our way), or if not, we are so ignorant of the reality of the situation that we easily succumb to the manipulations of the media (and bloggers and other sources of information)? On an issue like the one above, do people thirst so much to demonize Israel that they will automatically accept any claims made (check out the comments on this one as well for more example of this) regarding what the images represent and what they mean without questioning whether they are using them as fuel for their own biases?
As someone who also has posted images to newsvine, I direct these questions and thoughts at myself as much as at others. Images and words are powerful tools. Yet if we seek to engage in honest discussion regarding the world around us using these tools, it behooves us to use them honestly, in context and admitting what we know and do not know, rather than abusing the power that they contain in the hopes of dishonestly manipulating others.
I love this article, Yaakov. It's truly a matter of getting smarter here - questioning not just the facts but the reason why some "facts" are presented rather than others. It crystalised some ideas I had had looking at both Keld's photos and your photo. I also think you're getting at the heart of one of the difficulties behind the problems of the middle east (and other places) - the political necessity to express the motivations of others in ways which are advantageous. Images of children are so emotive that they are a great example of how this happens.
Thanks for the perspective.
While I agree that these images have been misrepresented as symbols of Israeli hatred (which may or may not exist, but is almost certainly not the case here), they do highlight another issue which I've written up here.
I was going to post it as a comment here, but it ended up being longer than the original post.
I direct these questions and thoughts at myself as much as at others
Thanks Yaakov. If everone tries to spend more time questioning themselves rather than trying to convince others, the world will be a better place.
Thank you Yaakov for an excellent and honest article. I wish there were more articles like this in these days. Be safe over there and keep us up to date on your perspective.
Thanks Yaakov. It still troubles me that in any country on earth that children can come so close to such dangerous weapons with a certain over-familiarity that war creates. Whether playing on tanks or toting Kalishnikovs, it always makes me sad to see children living in hell.
Your perspective is always a great contribution to the understanding we are trying to gain.
Posting photographs, such as the one in question, out of context, is wrong. Some might even say it's propaganda. Thank you for offering valuable insight to the situation. No matter what the circumstances were though, adults should know better and keep children away from the atrocities and instruments of war.
Children are victimized by both sides in this conflict, as they are part of the greater civilian population who no longer has any feeling of security. Children are not soldiers, nor should they be allowed to feel as such. Or even act as such. Bringing children further into the forefront of an adult war should stop. And someone should step in and protect them.
I couldn't agree more. I'm not really sure how much the context changes things here. I'm not saying that group X is now evil and full of hate...but I must say that I'm filled with confusion and disbelief. Of course, it could just be that I don't get it because I've never lived in a war zone or had my house shelled or had to dodge rockets fired by people who want me dead.
That being said...I still look at that photo and think 'wtf...this is just plain wrong,' -- and on so many levels. In the practical sense, what are children doing around artillery shells? Seriously...my mind boggles at this. Do all messages need to be from the barrel of a gun? It reminds me of the photo that was going around of a baby dressed up in insurgent/bomber gear. I had the same reaction to that...wtf!
Wonderful article Yaakov. You truly are an asset to the vine. Stay safe!
Where are all the Keld Bachs and I SPYs who were spouting off about hate filled Israelis? Why have they not responded here? Why have they not admitted the error they made?
You've clearly not been paying attention. Keld amended his article about the photo as soon as Yaakov pointed out the error, and thanked him. Keld has said many times, and I'm sure I SPY would have a similar view, that he condemns the Hezbollah actions but he presents the case against Israel because he feels that it doesn't get the attention that it deserves.
The hate filled responses here on the Vine have universally been directed at people like Keld and I SPY and Gideon who try to provide balance. You may not agree that that is what they're doing; you may not even agree that that is what they intend, but comments like yours (well, not so much like yours, but especially like Megido's below) do nothing to help the dialogue here on NV.
There's a principle of "play the ball, not the man" which should apply here, or NV would become a scene of verbal warfare.
I think Keld and Spy are more hate filled than the israelies they are constantly ranting about.
i don't see either of them bombing civilians.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |