Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Yaakov's column >>

YAAKOV

Home Page
Ponderings and Links on Israel and Jewish Issues and Technology
Articles Posted: 72  Links Seeded: 601
Member Since: 1/2006  Last Seen: 5/15/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Hillary: Triangulation on Israel?

Seeded on Mon Nov 5, 2007 2:54 AM EST
Read ArticleArticle Source: JPost.com
world-news, israel, middle-east, hillary-clinton, palestinians, peace, west-bank, foreign-affairs
Seeded by Yaakov
Advertise | AdChoices

Hillary Clinton has published her foreign policy agenda in Foreign Affairs magazine, under the title "Security and Opportunity for the Twenty-First Century." The one paragraph on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict draws deeply on the notions that "resolving the conflict" should be America's top priority, that both sides are equally at fault for the "violence," and that Palestinians need only make promises to earn statehood....IT IS ALL the more astonishing, then, that Hillary, who witnessed the debacle from up close, thinks "consistent US involvement," whatever its outcome, will "lower the level of violence and restore our credibility in the region." She ignores precisely the lesson inflicted upon us by the failed policy of the Clinton administration: If the US obsessively tinkers with this issue without result, it is bound to raise the level of violence and damage our credibility...In September, Hillary issued a statement on Israel designed to bolster her standing among pro-Israel voters. Her Foreign Affairs piece, aimed at the wider foreign policy establishment, takes a very different line.

Who is the real Hillary, behind the triangulation? Who knows?

After reading this article, it is clear to me that a vote for Hillary is a vote for continued and increased conflict in Israel, and a vote for continued US-led diplomatic mediocrity in the Middle East political arena.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • Yaakov's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Israel Talk, rightwingers
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (5)
johnmcd

Despite jabs at his results, Bill Clinton clearly supports Israel's existence. Democratic party has always been a strong supporter of Israel and the Republican party is more likely to lower support.
On the right side of the Republican party are a few who have questioned some of Israel's actions as counter to US interests.

    Reply#1 - Mon Nov 5, 2007 3:41 AM EST
    Yaakov

    I don't care if a person says that they "support Israel's existence" until they are blue in the face (as if any US politician would say that they didn't support Israel's existence??). However, if they follow this up with the rhetoric of "let's hold peace talks aimed at getting assurances from the Palestinians of their good intentions in return for Israel sacrificing land and security" (as Clinton and Bush have done) then they are ultimately acting against the best interests of Israel and in contradiction to their supposed support for "Israel's existence".

    Hillary falls into this category as well.

    • 1 vote
    #1.1 - Mon Nov 5, 2007 7:49 AM EST
    Steven Clark BradleyDeleted
    Reply
    IndependentVoter

    Why don't we stay out and let Israel handle it's affairs??

    • 2 votes
    Reply#2 - Mon Nov 5, 2007 4:42 PM EST
    thinking conservative

    make promises to earn statehood

    Wow, has that not work or what?! Some Palestinians may be of that mind set, but the leadership is sure not.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#3 - Tue Nov 6, 2007 12:26 PM EST
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse |
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com